Forum Rules [Updated 12/21/2016]


Please respect your community. Respect each other as you all enjoy the same thing ? The Game.

We encourage open and friendly discussion of the game and the Community. Moderators and Staff have final decisions on all matters, and are here to make sure that the Community remains a friendly, fun place appropriate for players of all backgrounds, ages and groups.

It is the forum member's responsibility to stay up to date on forum rules and to honor the behavior outlined.


These forums provide an area for constructive player discussions of the game. It also allows players to
help each other identify bugs and issues, and help each other reproduce and resolve them.

These forums are not the most direct way to contact support. If you?re having an issue with your game and you need direct assistance, please tap on the FAQ/Support tab within the game.


Please make sure to stay updated on these rules by reviewing this page from time to time.


This is a private board. As such, decisions made are final.
We reserve the right to remove any message board content without notice for any reason.

Rule 1: Responses to rule violations
Violating these rules will result in warnings, either formal or informal, suspensions, banning, or other sanctions.

Rule 2: Respect other users on the forums
- Do not make attacks or insult other users, either in the forums or through private messages. Disagreements and debates are fine, but don?t make it personal.
- Do not attack groups. This includes professions, races, religions, sexual orientations, genders, incomes, or even vague groups like ?you people.?
- Do not use ill terms which are offensive to groups, do not ?flame?, ?troll.? or ?haze?.

Rule 3: Respect the forum purpose and structure
- Make your posts in the appropriate forum.
- Please use the Search function. If a relevant thread already exists, please post there instead of creating a new thread about the same topic. Duplicate threads will be closed to keep the forums orderly and easy to navigate.
- Keep off-topic posts in the off-topic forum.
- Don?t start discussions about games that are not ours.
- Do not cross-link to other message boards or websites unless approved by a moderator.

Rule 4: Respect the law
- Do not post anything illegal under U.S. law, or encourage other users to break the laws of the U.S. or their country of residence.
- Do not encourage users to break terms of service. This includes giving information about how to find scripts, exploits, or cheats, as well as arranging to buy or sell accounts or virtual goods.

Rule 5: Respect the audience
Think about who you're talking to. Users may be as young as 13 on these message boards, and may be male or female, and from countries across the globe.
- Keep your language civil. Profanity is frowned on.
- Do not post Adult Material, inappropriate graphic sexual content in any format, or links to sexually explicit sites.
- Do not post graphic images or explicit descriptions of violent acts.
- Do not use an avatar or signature that could offend other users. They have to look at it a lot.

Rule 6: Respect privacy
- Do not post any private emails or private messages unless you have the explicit permission of each person involved in the exchange.
- Do not post private communication between customer support, members, moderators, or administrators on these forums, or anywhere else. (This include support ticket responses)
- Do not post any information covered by a non-disclosure agreement or beta testing agreement. Even if you somehow have inside information about our competitors, for legal reasons we don?t want to hear it.
- Do not post Facebook information about other forum users.
- Do not post any private information about other users.
- Do not post in-game information in an attempt to have other players attack your target. Be careful to not cross the line into bullying.

Rule 7: Do not spam
- Do not post repeatedly about the same topic.
- Do not spam users on the forums or through private messages.
- Do not start a thread without actual purpose.
- Do not start a thread about a news story or article unless you make it clear what the story is about, and offer your own opinion to start a discussion.

Rule 8: Respect your account
- Do not share your account information with other individuals. You will be held responsible for any rules violations that occur under your account.
- Do not create new accounts or use other tricks to avoid suspensions or bans.
- Do not create ?sock puppet? accounts ? multiple accounts created just so that you can agree with yourself and make it seem like your ideas have more support than they do.
- Never include your e-mail address or any other personal information in posts.

Rule 9: Respect the Moderators
- Do not post using the color red. This color is reserved for moderators.
- Do not impersonate moderators. Do not claim to speak for the moderators.

Rule 10: Respect the decisions of the moderators
- The moderation teams reserves the right to warn, suspend, or permanently ban users judged to be acting against the spirit of the rules, even if the user is following the letter of the rules.
- Do not argue with moderators about moderator decisions. You can disagree with a moderator?s opinions, just like any other poster, but when they post moderator actions in red text, it is considered final.
- Moderators have no access to your game account. If you have an issue you must contact customer service.

Generally, BE NICE. There is nothing wrong with being nice to each other.
See more
See less

Some help understanding these hits

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some help understanding these hits

    Can someone help explain these hits I defended? I was hit three times by the same person. Hit 1 occurred at a different city than Hits 2 & 3. Hit 1 had a different defense knight than Hits 2 & 3. He used the same attack knight in Hits 1 and 3. I’m kind of baffled how I got 0 kills in defense on Hit 1.
    Both of my knights are dressed for defense and are pretty similar. His knight on Hits 1 & 3 appears to be dressed for defense while his knight on hit 2 appears to be dressed for attack.
    Here is my best estimate at his knights stats based on the report along with my knights stats and information regarding how/where the hits were defended.

    Hit 1 Summary & Report Info:

    Hit 2 Summary & Report Info:

    Hit 3 Summary & Report Info:

    Hit 2 seems to have the most reasonable outcome. His knight is better than mine, my heroes better than his, my troops outnumber/tier his.
    Hit 3 seems plausible even though my knight far outweighs his and my heroes have the advantage. He sent some mercenary and T4s at my T3.
    Hit 1 just makes no sense what so ever.

    Am i off base to think my defense should have killed at least 1 troop?

    Sorry, i can't figure out how to insert images into post anymore.

  • #2
    You are asking something beyond kabams knowledge and explenations!
    For years those questions are unanswered, get in line I guess?


    • #3
      Hit 1: The attacker had big heroes in there and a defensive knight. The defender had mostly t1 wall which is super weak. All the damage from that wall got soaked up by the heroes buffed with the defensive knight.

      Hit 2: The opposite situation: Strong defending heroes soaked a lot of the damage. The attacker used an attack knight so his army got wiped out (small heroes and little defensive buff).

      Hit 3: Exactly what you said. His defensive knight simply couldn't kill much against your defense.

      What's confusing you here is probably the flat hero damage/damage absorption. If the damage being delivered isn't big enough, it won't go past the heroes, so your walls at hit 1 just didn't cut it. Once you get past the hero absorption, the damage gets distributed as usual.


      • #4
        Thanks for the responses. I know these kinds of questions have been asked before, but in order for the damage on both sides to be calculated, there has to be some sort of formula used should be an answerable question to the developers.

        As for Hit 1, tempicek, its for the very reason he used a defensive knight in his attack that there should have been some attackers killed. The attack boost Gareth & Owain have together at their levels is pretty much negated by the life boost Tristan and Aglovale have together at their levels. I would think at that point, the focus would be on the knights then. In which case, a defensive knight on the attack against a defensive knight should not fare that well.
        Going to %url_domain%


        • #5
          You are right on the heroes, i didn't notice there were 3 of them defending. So yes, they seem pretty balanced.

          As for the knight, if the attacker used an attack knight, we would have probably gotten wiped out. He'd still win, but he'd big chunk [or the whole] of his army. He used a defensive knight, however, so compare YOUR ATTACK against HIS DEFENSE. Tiny. That's why no troops killed. Now, you could say - but his attack bonus is tiny too, - which would be true, but he also had way bigger army (t3 troop against t1 wall).


          • #6
            I agree with temp but the other thing u need to take into account with hits 2 & 3is troop type.. The attacker sent mixed troops to nothing but ground troops. Had he sent arterially he would have don't allot more damage. The fact he sent ya some cav helped u out