Some help understanding these hits

[889083]

Can someone help explain these hits I defended? I was hit three times by the same person. Hit 1 occurred at a different city than Hits 2 & 3. Hit 1 had a different defense knight than Hits 2 & 3. He used the same attack knight in Hits 1 and 3. I’m kind of baffled how I got 0 kills in defense on Hit 1.
Both of my knights are dressed for defense and are pretty similar. His knight on Hits 1 & 3 appears to be dressed for defense while his knight on hit 2 appears to be dressed for attack.
Here is my best estimate at his knights stats based on the report along with my knights stats and information regarding how/where the hits were defended.

Hit 1 Summary & Report Info:

http://i.imgur.com/WWsLDIy.jpg

Hit 2 Summary & Report Info:

http://i.imgur.com/wtRCdaY.jpg

Hit 3 Summary & Report Info:

http://i.imgur.com/BmTXwJb.jpg

Hit 2 seems to have the most reasonable outcome. His knight is better than mine, my heroes better than his, my troops outnumber/tier his.
Hit 3 seems plausible even though my knight far outweighs his and my heroes have the advantage. He sent some mercenary and T4s at my T3.
Hit 1 just makes no sense what so ever.

Am i off base to think my defense should have killed at least 1 troop?

Sorry, i can't figure out how to insert images into post anymore.

[Guest]

You are asking something beyond kabams knowledge and explenations!
For years those questions are unanswered, get in line I guess?

[Guest]

Hit 1: The attacker had big heroes in there and a defensive knight. The defender had mostly t1 wall which is super weak. All the damage from that wall got soaked up by the heroes buffed with the defensive knight.

Hit 2: The opposite situation: Strong defending heroes soaked a lot of the damage. The attacker used an attack knight so his army got wiped out (small heroes and little defensive buff).

Hit 3: Exactly what you said. His defensive knight simply couldn't kill much against your defense.

What's confusing you here is probably the flat hero damage/damage absorption. If the damage being delivered isn't big enough, it won't go past the heroes, so your walls at hit 1 just didn't cut it. Once you get past the hero absorption, the damage gets distributed as usual.

[avaxyfgivtv]

Thanks for the responses. I know these kinds of questions have been asked before, but in order for the damage on both sides to be calculated, there has to be some sort of formula used ....it should be an answerable question to the developers.

As for Hit 1, tempicek, its for the very reason he used a defensive knight in his attack that there should have been some attackers killed. The attack boost Gareth & Owain have together at their levels is pretty much negated by the life boost Tristan and Aglovale have together at their levels. I would think at that point, the focus would be on the knights then. In which case, a defensive knight on the attack against a defensive knight should not fare that well.

[Guest]

You are right on the heroes, i didn't notice there were 3 of them defending. So yes, they seem pretty balanced.

As for the knight, if the attacker used an attack knight, we would have probably gotten wiped out. He'd still win, but he'd big chunk [or the whole] of his army. He used a defensive knight, however, so compare YOUR ATTACK against HIS DEFENSE. Tiny. That's why no troops killed. Now, you could say - but his attack bonus is tiny too, - which would be true, but he also had way bigger army (t3 troop against t1 wall).

[Guest]

I agree with temp but the other thing u need to take into account with hits 2 & 3is troop type.. The attacker sent mixed troops to nothing but ground troops. Had he sent arterially he would have don't allot more damage. The fact he sent ya some cav helped u out