Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules [Updated 12/21/2016]

MAIN RULES OF THE FORUMS

Please respect your community. Respect each other as you all enjoy the same thing ? The Game.

We encourage open and friendly discussion of the game and the Community. Moderators and Staff have final decisions on all matters, and are here to make sure that the Community remains a friendly, fun place appropriate for players of all backgrounds, ages and groups.

It is the forum member's responsibility to stay up to date on forum rules and to honor the behavior outlined.

PURPOSE OF THE FORUMS

These forums provide an area for constructive player discussions of the game. It also allows players to
help each other identify bugs and issues, and help each other reproduce and resolve them.

These forums are not the most direct way to contact support. If you?re having an issue with your game and you need direct assistance, please tap on the FAQ/Support tab within the game.

CHANGES OR IMPROVEMENT

Please make sure to stay updated on these rules by reviewing this page from time to time.

SET RULES

This is a private board. As such, decisions made are final.
We reserve the right to remove any message board content without notice for any reason.


Rule 1: Responses to rule violations
Violating these rules will result in warnings, either formal or informal, suspensions, banning, or other sanctions.

Rule 2: Respect other users on the forums
- Do not make attacks or insult other users, either in the forums or through private messages. Disagreements and debates are fine, but don?t make it personal.
- Do not attack groups. This includes professions, races, religions, sexual orientations, genders, incomes, or even vague groups like ?you people.?
- Do not use ill terms which are offensive to groups, do not ?flame?, ?troll.? or ?haze?.

Rule 3: Respect the forum purpose and structure
- Make your posts in the appropriate forum.
- Please use the Search function. If a relevant thread already exists, please post there instead of creating a new thread about the same topic. Duplicate threads will be closed to keep the forums orderly and easy to navigate.
- Keep off-topic posts in the off-topic forum.
- Don?t start discussions about games that are not ours.
- Do not cross-link to other message boards or websites unless approved by a moderator.

Rule 4: Respect the law
- Do not post anything illegal under U.S. law, or encourage other users to break the laws of the U.S. or their country of residence.
- Do not encourage users to break terms of service. This includes giving information about how to find scripts, exploits, or cheats, as well as arranging to buy or sell accounts or virtual goods.

Rule 5: Respect the audience
Think about who you're talking to. Users may be as young as 13 on these message boards, and may be male or female, and from countries across the globe.
- Keep your language civil. Profanity is frowned on.
- Do not post Adult Material, inappropriate graphic sexual content in any format, or links to sexually explicit sites.
- Do not post graphic images or explicit descriptions of violent acts.
- Do not use an avatar or signature that could offend other users. They have to look at it a lot.

Rule 6: Respect privacy
- Do not post any private emails or private messages unless you have the explicit permission of each person involved in the exchange.
- Do not post private communication between customer support, members, moderators, or administrators on these forums, or anywhere else. (This include support ticket responses)
- Do not post any information covered by a non-disclosure agreement or beta testing agreement. Even if you somehow have inside information about our competitors, for legal reasons we don?t want to hear it.
- Do not post Facebook information about other forum users.
- Do not post any private information about other users.
- Do not post in-game information in an attempt to have other players attack your target. Be careful to not cross the line into bullying.

Rule 7: Do not spam
- Do not post repeatedly about the same topic.
- Do not spam users on the forums or through private messages.
- Do not start a thread without actual purpose.
- Do not start a thread about a news story or article unless you make it clear what the story is about, and offer your own opinion to start a discussion.

Rule 8: Respect your account
- Do not share your account information with other individuals. You will be held responsible for any rules violations that occur under your account.
- Do not create new accounts or use other tricks to avoid suspensions or bans.
- Do not create ?sock puppet? accounts ? multiple accounts created just so that you can agree with yourself and make it seem like your ideas have more support than they do.
- Never include your e-mail address or any other personal information in posts.

Rule 9: Respect the Moderators
- Do not post using the color red. This color is reserved for moderators.
- Do not impersonate moderators. Do not claim to speak for the moderators.

Rule 10: Respect the decisions of the moderators
- The moderation teams reserves the right to warn, suspend, or permanently ban users judged to be acting against the spirit of the rules, even if the user is following the letter of the rules.
- Do not argue with moderators about moderator decisions. You can disagree with a moderator?s opinions, just like any other poster, but when they post moderator actions in red text, it is considered final.
- Moderators have no access to your game account. If you have an issue you must contact customer service.

Generally, BE NICE. There is nothing wrong with being nice to each other.
See more
See less

Sword Mastery Event! SCAM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tanks_alot
    replied
    At least your alliance was given the chance to participate in this event. We were left in the dust.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheUB
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt_Kabam View Post
    I looked into the event as well as the prizes and it looks about right based on the number of participants we normally get for this type of event. What I can do at this point is look into the number of people in the alliances actually participating in recent events like this one and try to rework the prize structure based on those numbers.

    Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention.
    Vort 17 the same thing. My alliance came in first, 6 or 7 chests. And 100 members. Not 1 of us received a sword mastery.

    And this new contest disclaimer that you have to sign in for trained might to update is horrible.

    Leave a comment:


  • celinas_far
    replied
    If you fire of 600 mill that only means he was doing it to get more chests like me i fired of 550 mill in that contest to give my non gemmers in my alli some free chests what it had in it wasent important it was my way of giving them xtra troops cause i can afford it and if you really read what the contest said you need to log in for your might to count in the tourney maestro so you didnt log in before the tourney end your fault not kabams it was written down in the bottom and those 50 k chests are a chance from t2-4 or 5 cant remember mine had a 50/50 of t2-3 and a little t4 in them its an old chest brought back for this contest so seriusly you guys need to read what the contests says before going to bed or even participate in a contest im out have fun

    Leave a comment:


  • HunBun
    replied
    Although I agree with raylan... The lowest prize is what you get 99.9% of the time... The winner of 25 chests, opening over 600 million might to win didn't get a single mastery is disheartening.

    Leave a comment:


  • kitkatmiller
    replied
    The stealing is in regards to purchasing with gems, forging, and not getting a forge.

    And so kabam your numbers seem right in comparison to the players who participated? Because there's an awful lot of no masteries from what I've read. What were the payouts ? 1 mastery per 10000 chests?

    The second event offering a shield mastery I won 9 chests and again no mastery. 15 chests and no mastery in total.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alien8
    replied
    Ok now for the latest Flash tom that gave out 50K Mastery chests we got sames problems. My alliance won a ton of these and nobody reported winning a shield/sword mastery but even worse the ToM deion said as options you could win a 245 grail and so does the deion of the chest but everyone who won a grail won a 220 not 245. I can't use 220 grail cause all my knights are 225 or higher and I was hoping to make a 225 into a 245 then finish it of with mystic training. Nowhere in the deion does it say a 220 as an option and it doesn't say "up to" a 245 either. Once again everyone is reporting getting mostly T2 or 3 troops which are not even a fraction of what it took us in troops to win them. Please go back to both these events and maybe give each chest winner a "fixed 50k mastery chest" for each we won like you did with them false labeled chests from a couple weeks ago. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Havent_a_clue
    replied
    Originally posted by kitkatmiller View Post
    Consumers have the right to know exactly what they are purchasing! This bull crap on wording of chests and events is completely unacceptable! Have for sale exactly what is offered. The "chance of this or that" is and always will be code for "no chance at all" if kabam sell an item that says sword mastery chest then it should contain one. I don't care if kabam Jack the price up on such a chest . At least we will get what we paid for! Any other goods and services provider would be seeing a lot of refunds ! Same applies to this "chance" of forging ! Ppl spend gems to do it , it's basically STEALING! I think forging should be based on obtaining req material and have it forge , increase the hammer / dust if they want to but atleast we get what we paid for! If they were so concerned about ppl getting multiple sword masteries then the Damn prize should of been 1 sword mastery chest and 6 troop chests for first, 5 for sec etc etc! Not only is it theft but the "chance" crap is gambling and last I checked the game isn't 18+!
    Stealing? I don't think so. If people use gems to buy troop chests and then choose to use those chests in an attempt to win a chest with a chance of a mastery that not theft.

    Most chests in competitions are 'a chance of winning' - don't know what the odds are but I rarely get the top prize. As I don't buy gems anything free is a bonus!

    Leave a comment:


  • FuZaiN_CharismA
    replied
    i have confirmed in my world hengiest 48, no one won mastery, such a shame

    Leave a comment:


  • Shizouka
    replied
    Same in 66. 1st place 100 members no sword masteries. From what was said no one won any. But you shouldn't be shocked I was already anticipating troops.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lady Morganna
    replied
    Yes, very disappointing. We came in 1st. Had 100 people in the alliance. Not a single one of us won a sword mastery.

    I agree w the earlier suggestion - promise 1 (or 2 or 3) for 1st place, plus troops, then a lesser number for 2nd, 3rd, etc., the way you do w the valentines gear in the current tourney.

    In addition to fixing this problem going forward. I think kabam should award at least 1 sword mastery to the members of the 1st place team in each world. If you want to generate good will, 3 to 1st place, 2 to 2nd place and 1 to 3rd place would be a nice gesture. We spent gems to win the comp thinking we would win at least some sword masteries. Every time a tourney turns out to have rotten prizes that make us feel cheated, we lose players and also are less willing to shell out $$ or ££ for gems for the next tourney.

    Come on kabam. Start treating your players fairly if you want to keep us.

    Morganna, TheWolfPack, Guinevere 37

    Leave a comment:


  • Alien8
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt_Kabam View Post
    I looked into the event as well as the prizes and it looks about right based on the number of participants we normally get for this type of event. What I can do at this point is look into the number of people in the alliances actually participating in recent events like this one and try to rework the prize structure based on those numbers.

    Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention.
    I agree with all the others. These chests were a real let down. My alliance got 1st in ector 46. Everyone in my alliance (96 people total almost 600 chests total) all reported getting the least two of the possible prizes in the chests. Almost all were T2's or t3's and not a single shield mastery for anyone. I hope the currant prizes for the flash tom of 50k mastery chests are much better then that. The description is pretty vague, doesn't even say what type of troops we can get.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt_Kabam
    replied
    I looked into the event as well as the prizes and it looks about right based on the number of participants we normally get for this type of event. What I can do at this point is look into the number of people in the alliances actually participating in recent events like this one and try to rework the prize structure based on those numbers.

    Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention.

    Leave a comment:


  • kitkatmiller
    replied
    Feb 8th 20:00- Feb 9th at 02:00 UTC , Alliance Tournament of Might.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt_Kabam
    replied
    Can somebody post up the dates of the event in question? I'll be happy to take a look at the event and the prize payouts.

    Leave a comment:


  • RaylanV36
    replied
    Guys at the end of the day it's your own fault. If you haven't learned by now to look at what the chest offers, then you are screwing yourselves. I hate the way Kabam does things as much as anybody. They have themselves covered because it's up to us to read what the wording says. "Contains one of the following" is the red flag to pick out the lowest value prize and know that's what it contains almost every time. If there was a chest called "Bag of Crap Chest" would you complain because there was 10k gems, 50 Fury, and LH gear inside instead of a turd? The name of the chest means nothing. It's what's inside and the wording of the prizes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X